Yet more Vobes and associated space cadets.

First, start here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Jdw6oFCWSs&ab_channel=RichardVobes
An interesting view into the twisted byways of the mind of Mr Vobes and his acolytes (or co-conspirators?).
When reading this, keep in mind the phrase "thick as mince".

In this video,near the start (09:00 mins) his fellow escapee, John Hamer, tells us, quite flatly, that dinosaurs didn't exist. The idea of dinosaurs was created to simply hook children into the idea of getting them to badger their parents into buying dinosaur related items, such as pyjamas etc). I wondered if he may be right so I checked up on a couple of those involved with the first evidence of dinoaurs. These were Robert Plot, who produced and published the first known example of an illustration of a dinosaur bone. (Initially, he thought it was the bone of a giant. Silly boy!). There was also a bloke named William Buckland who produced the first work describing and naming the dinosaur species.
So, I thought I should look up their Social Media pages, blogs etc and was bitterly disappointed when I failed to find anything in that area. Well, that's baffling! How can any successful marketing campaign be expected to produce results if not backed up by social media, influencers etc? It can't, of course. And considering that Mr. Plot was alive from 1640 to 1696, while and Mr Buckland was alive from 1784 to 1856, I had expected to find a couple of hundred years of archived blogs, ad campaigns etc but...nothing! Nada! Zilch!
Mr. Buckland may be interesting. In his other job, besides dreaming up and running ad campaigns for the nascent Amazon flog it industry, he was a theologian. Well, that is just grand! A lot of Mr Vobes' co-conspirator clowns come under the heading of "God Botherers" so he should fit right in there. In fact, from the small fraction of the latest Vobes' output, I think today's lunatic, John Hamer, is about to launch into a deep scientific and philosophical leacture on how, whatever the topic, it was God wot did it! (Makes a change from the bloody Scum saying it!). So, I shall return to suffer what I expect to be an assault on my sense....

Oh! Here we go. Seconds after Mr Vobes hinting at his dearly beloved weather changing via chem trails etc, his guest says "What people fail to comprehend is that solar and wind power contributes less than 2% to our national energy generation". As I write this, data from the National Grid shows the generation of electricity, at this moment, to be comprised of coal 1.1%, gas 24.8%, solar 13.5%, wind 21%. (Plus others such as nuclear etc). Well, which of those numbers is closest to 2%? Coal at 1.1%. Soalr outstrips the 2% figure by a factor of 6.75 times and wind outstrips the 2% figure by a factor of almost 10 times. He goes on to say that electricity is mainly generated by fossil fuels. 25% (including gas powered generation) is today's figure. How does that amount to "mainly generated"?
So, is that obvious discrepancy another hole in the waterline for the idiot's argument?
Let's see.
Oo err missus! Now he is stating that oil is NOT a fossil fuel but it is something the earth continues creating, although he does have the front to admit the process is a mystery to him.
Christ on a bike! Now we get to the impossibilty of the moon landings. My forehead is getting sore from from repeated slaps almost every time either of this pair of charlatans open their gobs.
Aaaagh! Now gravity doesn't exist! If you drop an object and it falls to the ground, gravity has nothing to do with it. It is solely due to "relative density", ie: if the object is denser than air, it will fall to the ground and, if less dense than air it will float upwards. Off to la la land, no doubt!

Now, while enthralling themselves with their superior knowledge, and as part of a flat earth piece of twaddle, Mr Hamer tells us the Antarctic Treaty was signed by "every nation on earth". Was it bugger! Unless, in 1959, "earth" consisted of only 12 nations. Mr Hamer also informs us that we can see objects hundreds of miles away, when the scientific/mathematical models say they should not be visible beyond a couple of miles. What shite! I must admit, I have seen mountain ranges from tens of miles away when they are beyond the horizon. I have to confess though that the times when I have seen this have all been in the deserts of the Arabian Peninsula. And there is a name for this phenomenon; they are known as "Mirages". I suppose that may disappoint the loony tunes Harmer who probably thinks a mirage is an image of a man, crawling on hands and knees with his 2 foot long tongue hanging out and headed toward a soft drinks stand situated beneath a nice palm tree.