Mr. Waterman's most recent posts demonstrate yet a further descent into madness. In the first of the two, he rabbits on for 7 minutes declaring all manner of shite; from how we are all being controlled by magic stuff coming out of 5G masts. Take a look at it here; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VufK5ornIm4&t=228s&ab. Click on "more" in the description and review a list of some of his whacky ideas. It beggars belief.
In part 2 of his series dedicated to Sunak, he makes cock up after cock up with his links from from this to that. At least he is consistent with his blunders. While checking out his claims, it got to a point where he got it so wrong that I assumed all further links following his most stupid one that it wasn't worth carrying on checking to the bitter end.
To Mr. Waterman; here are my comments on your sad effort:
Now, the madness intensifies. Barlclays Plc. Overview shows Barclays Bank Plc 20 July 1896-01 Jan 1985 and you go on to point out the incorporation docs show Barclays and COMPANY, LIMITED. Because there is a slight discrepany in the names (as you would expect as the term 'PLC' came into use in 1981. Almost 100 years after the company was registered. The incorporation doc is shown as filed 01 Jan 1900. The company name was changed 16 February 1917 to Barclays Bank Limited. On 15 February 1982, the company was re-registered as Barclays Bank Plc. (look at that! Shortly after introduction of Plc designation). On 1st Jan 1985, the name was changed to Barclays Plc. So, what's the grief here? According to you, "that is a deliberate falsification of the register". It is not! It is a failure of you to do your research properly.
Blundering along quite swiftly, you get to Shell Company of Venezuela Limited (The). Let's see what pearls of wisdom you are about to drop here... Aah! An old favourite of yours, the certificate of incorporation shows company name as Venezuelan Petroluem Exploration and. straight away, you spot that there is "no 'The' at all". After the incorporation document from 1913, the next document available to view on line (I am not paying £3 a pop to see others!) is 5th November 1991 and shows The Shell Company Of Venezuela Limited has been re-incorporated as Shell Response Limited. Aah! Reading the Memorandum & Articles of Association, filed 29 Nov 1991, I see "The name was changed on 15th February 1945 from Venezuela Petroleum Exploaration Limited to the Shell Company of Venezuela Limited and on 6th November 1991 to Shell Response Limited.
Standard Chartered Plc: You say Standard Chartered Bank Public Limited Company incorporation document has a "completely different name. So it does; the name shown is Standard and Chartered Banking Group. On 1st October 1975, a company name change was filed showing the change from the Incorporation name to Standard Chartered Bank Limited. Filing on 1st February 1982 shows the re-registration of the company as a 'public company and the company is limited'. On 1st January 1985, the name was changed to 'Standard Chartered Plc.' So, nothing untoward there! But, according to you "FRAUD"!
Slaughter And May is next. You introduced them as "A flase legal entity company". Best to check on that next then. Companies House shows a current address of 2 Lambs Passage EC1Y 8BB. Incorportation as "A.U.I. (Holdings) Limited on 6h May 1954. Next available document, 4th October 1978 shows a company name change from Trucidator Holdings Ltd to Trucidator Limited at 35 Basinghall St. EC2V 5DB. On 30th April 2019 the company name changed from Trucidator Limited to Slaughter & May Limited. So, still "a false legal entity company"?
There follows an apparently unrelated jump to Black Horse Limited:
Incorporated 1st June 1960 as Gwent and West Finance Company Limited. On 1st November 1962, name changed to Julian S Hodge & Company Limited. On 28th December 1979, name changed again to Chartered Trust Limited and on 2nd Sept 1981, re-registered, changing from Private to Public Limited Company. On 5th July 2001, re-registered as a Private company under the name of Black Horse Limited. None of the froegoing stopped you from failing to spot the links/details I have listed so you charge along blindly, declaring "The Solicitors Law Stationery Society" features on many of your previous documents. Of course it does. It was the outfit that provided all manner of legal documents for companies to use in their correspondece, official documents such as forms required of Companies House for official filings etc. In other words, they were stationers, catering to the legal profession. At this point, you just can't help yourself pointing out there is an address and company, featured heavily elsewhere of Jordans Limited. Stop it! I have pointed out your errors re this company in my other blogs so, for goddness' sake, wake up and smell the coffee!
And now, for the star of the show, Rishi Sunak. You tell us that he was born 12 May 1980. Your search of Companies House shows Rish Sunak with a date of birth of December 1980. To quote you "almost the same date of birth but slightly different". Despite what expedia told you re date of birth, you chose to look at one with a different date of birth, December 1980. How about if you tried what I did and checked Companies House with a name match and DOB of May 1980? Shock! Horror! This shows a Rishi Sunak with DOB May 1980 as director of "East London Science School Trust" from 3 December 2013, resigning on 15th November 2015. Also listed for Rishi Sunak, DOB May 1980 as director of TCI Advisory Servies LLP; appointed 4th September 2006 and resigned 2nd November 2009. You then go off on a total waste of time, looking at Catamaran Ventures. So I can skip that rubbish and in fact I can skip the whole of the remainder of your post as it all stemms from the incorrect you made to Catamaran Ventures.
Referring to his other, related, video re Sunak, I posted the following comment some hours ago and it has attracted no response from either Mr. Waterman or his acoyltes:
"Gary, as I have shown previously, is obviously off his head. There are NO links to anything in his latest Sunak video, only cock-ups. And, hearing what just came out of his mouth re Russain, Ukrainian and Royal family links is beyond absurd. (See the link at the start of this blog)(But if he is pals with the other space cadet, Richard Vobes, what would you expect?) I would say,, from what you spout about 5G masts etc, you know nothing of telecomms etc. Mind you, from what I have seen of your other failed linking videos, I can confidently say you don't have a clue about sensible detective work either!"
STOP PRESS! I have just seen yet another contribution uploaded while I was writing this. So, off I must go to check this one out.
No comments:
Post a Comment