Well, here we go again! Following on from the removal of Part 2 & 4 by YouTube, I got into Part 3 and within one minute Waterman was talking crap!. He singled out a company, D&D Law Agency Services Ltd. He tells us it was incorporated in 1998. It was actually incorporated in 1974. As Mr. Waterman is constantly reminding us, one can go to Companies House and look at the records. Presumably the same records he looks at, so how can he get this so wrong? He then goes on to say 1998 was the same year some political ne'er do well started his "sex parties". I have to keep pausing the video to check on the nonsense so this is getting a bit tricky, so bear with me here: At the very beginning of the video he is doing the God Botherer thing, rambling on about the end of the world and how the term "brimstone" came into his head. Then he says this term appears in the address of D&D Law. Waterman states that D&D Law was linked to Nicola Bulley and God knows what else. Well, the original address of D&D Law was Lincolns Inn Fields, later changed in 1996 to Temple Chambers.In September 2001, the address changed once more to 312B High St. Orpington, followed by another change in Feb 2006 to an address in Chelsfield in Kent. In May 2013, there was another change to Lansing, W. Susex and in 2018 there was the final change back to the Chelsfield address which remains the current address. Should I report a theft to the police? Someone has stolen this Brimstone address. D&D Law etc, according to Waterman has links to Dwyer. Staggering news! The principal behind this company was a Mr. Daniel Dwyer. Imagine that! Dwyer is linked to Dwyer!
There now follows what I would call an "imaginary link" To McLellen International. Aaah! One of the previous directors 25th December 1998 to 15th January 1999 was Daniel John Dwyer and his address is/was 6 Brimstone Close Chelsfield. Recognise that town? He was listed at that time as "Nominee Secretary". This role is defined as: "A nominee secretary is a person or company who consents to be named as the secretary of a company. This is usually in exchange for a fee." (Definition from the web site of Complete Formations) This Daniel Dwyer is shown as having 5,061 appointments. Well, that is to be expected from a company that deals in the setting up of businesses, isn't it? How about the address of Brimstone Close? Well, I assume we can assume he didn't name it that; it existed when he moved into it so what is the link? There isn't one! McLellen International is an active company and their business shown as "facilities support". In my experience, this means caretaker type services and lo and behold, among the previous names is "Checkclean Ltd". Which I would assume also relates to caretaker type of work. So how on earth does this company "link" to 9/11, Nicola Bulley et al? Sod all, as far as I can see, other than Daniel Dwyer. Mr. Waterman seems to have a fixation on Mr. Dwyer, a man in his 80s.
Oh! Here we go again. All this is apparently a chance for Mr Waterman to save the world. I kid you not! Have a listen to what he says around the 2min 30s mark. Following this, he goes on about a company Named New Forest something. Talk about a serious case of the non-sequitur. No obvious links to any of the people or companies he has been defaming up to now. Still; Soldier on!
Change of mind; the idea of "soldiering on" has become distasteful, having watched another 10 minutes of this unutterable shite!. I am serious; from something to something else, he pounced on Trident nuclear weapon system. Now he is going mad for any company with the name "Trident" anywhere in it. It just beggars belief. Now he is talking about the failed Trident test launch back in February. He "proves" he knows what he is talking about by telling us about how there 2 such failures, while pointing to a collection of media quotes which all refer to a single failure. You can't beat that sort of genius, can you! But wait! It seems you can, if your name is Gary. His argument now is "why should the media report this at a delicate time in terms of current conflicts etc". Well, it is down to all the media companies being linked to something or other and that they are all involved in this cover up. Well, that's clear then.
Moving on, he gets to have a go at Interserve Ltd. The first major, "Stop the press!" moment is when he claims this company is (was) an illegal entity, claiming there is a discrepancy in their incorporation document. Let's see... Gary says the company should be listed as Tilbury Contracting Group Public Limited GroupCompany, which is shown on the precis front page ifno. He says it should be listed as Tilbury Contracting and Dredging Company (1906) Limited. Well, that is indeed what the document syays. In May 1908, the name was changed, dropping the (1906). In 1964, it was changed again to Tilbury Contracting Group Limited. That dosn't stop Mr. Waterman from proclaiming it has never been lawfully registered. Why does Companies House bother? There have been other name changes over the years but that is all academic.
From here, it all reverts to standard bizarre mode. And I give up!
No comments:
Post a Comment